Last updated 6/30/98

Table of Contents

Postemergence Broadleaf Weed Control

Clark Throssell and Dan Weisenberger

 

Objective

Our objective was to determine the effectiveness of commercially available and experimental postemergence herbicides for broadleaf weed control.

Rationale

Broadleaf weeds are a problem on many turf sites. Postemergence herbicides are often applied on these sites to control broadleaf weeds. It is important to continually examine new herbicides and new ways to use existing herbicides for their ability to control broadleaf weeds.

How It Was Done

A stand of Kentucky bluegrass turf, at the Agronomy Research Center, with a substantial population of dandelion, black medic and mouseear chickweed was selected as the site for this experiment. The site was mowed at 2 inches twice per week with clippings returned. No fertilizer was applied during the course of the experiment and irrigation was applied to prevent any sign of drought stress. The initial date of herbicide application was 5 June and split (sequential) applications, where specified, were made on 26 June 1997. All herbicide treatments were applied using a three nozzle hand held boom in 2 gals. of water per 1,000 sq. ft. Data collected were phytotoxicity to the Kentucky bluegrass turf and a visual rating of percent of plot area covered with broadleaf weeds on 20 June and 3 and 17 July 1997.

Results

CGA 136872 is a herbicide from CIBA and will not be labelled for use in turf. Scoil is a surfactant also from CIBA.

 

Table 11. Percent broadleaf weed cover following treatment with commercially available and experimental herbicides.

       Broadleaf weed cover      

Treatment

Rate of application

June 20

July 3

July 17

                      percent                      
Check --- 61.7 50.0 51.7
CGA 136872 20.0c 40.0 25.0 25.0
+ Scoilb 0.25d
CGA 136872 10.0c 48.3 16.7 9.0
+ Scoilb 0.25d

CGA 136872

10.0c
+ Scoilab 0.25d
BAS 514 34H 75WG 0.75f 21.7 6.7 2.7
+ BAS 090 02 Sb 1.0d
BAS 514 34H 75WG 1.5f 8.3 3.7 2.7

+ BAS 090 02 Sb

1.0d
BAS 514 34H 75WG 0.75f 5.0 1.7 1.7
+ BAS 090 02 Sb 1.0d
+ Trimec Classicb 4.0e
BAS 514 34H 75WG 1.5f 5.0 1.0 1.7
+ BAS 090 02 Sb 1.0d
+ Trimec Classicb 4.0e
Trimec Classic 4.0e 10.0 4.3 7.7
BAS 514 34H 75WG 0.75f 5.0 2.3 1.7
+ BAS 090 02 Sb 1.0d
+ Trimec Classicb 2.0e
BAS 514 34H 75WG 1.5f 10.0 2.7 1.0
+ BAS 090 02 Sb 1.0d
+ Trimec Classicb 2.0e
Trimec Classic 2.0e 26.7 8.3 8.3
LSD (0.05) 12.0 16.3 13.5
a Split application with first application 5 June and second application 26 June (3 week split).
b Products were applied as a tankmix.
c Rate of application was grams product per acre.
d Rate of application was percent volume per volume.
e Rate of application was pints per acre.
f Rate of application was lbs a.i. per area.

 

Table of Contents


Send corrections, suggestions, and comments to biehlj@purdue.edu