Last updated 7/3/01

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT PERMISSION

Table of Contents

1997 NTEP Bermudagrass Cultivar Evaluation – 2000 Results

Zac Reicher and Glenn Hardebeck, Department of Agronomy

Bill Lampkins, MacDonald Golf Course, Evansville

Objective

The objective of this study is to determine the survivability and performance of seeded and vegetatively established bermudagrass in Evansville, IN.

Rationale

With genetically improved cultivars, bermudagrass is being used or considered for golf course fairways and athletic fields in southern IN. There has been tremendous genetic improvement in winter survivability and leaf texture for bermudagrass and so this species may now be better adapted to Southern IN than it has been in the past. Additionally, seeded varieties of are now available which will decrease the cost of establishing bermudagrass. However, we are unsure of the long term winter survival of bermudagrass on the northern edge of the transition zone.

How It Was Done

The study was located on the Wessman Par-3 Course in Evansville IN. Roundup was applied to the seedbed and then tilled to a 2 inch depth. A starter fertilizer (8-22-16) was applied prior to seeding at 1.5 lbs P2O5/1000 ft2. On 25 June 1997, two separate but adjacent studies for seeded types and vegetative types were established. Plot size for each study was 6 ft X 6 ft with 1.5 ft borders and each study contained 3 replications. Nineteen seeded Bermudagrass cultivars were seeded at 0.85 lbs/1000 ft2 and then "dimpled in" with tires of a sand rake. Eleven bermudagrass cultivars were plugged with 1.5 in X 1.5 in plugs on 12 inch centers. The seeded varieties were covered with seed cloth to encourage germination, and then the entire area was watered 2 to 3 times daily to encourage germination and establishment. The area was mowed at 1 inch, irrigated to prevent moisture stress, and received 1.0 lb N/1000 ft2 with a 25-4-12 fertilizer on 10 July and 5 Aug. Annual maintenance included mowing at 1 inch once or twice per week, irrigation to prevent dormancy, and 0.5-0.75 lb N/1000 ft2/growing month. This study will continue through the 2001 growing season.

Results to Date

Bermudagrass is sensitive to winterkill, especially in the first winter following establishment Though all of the cultivars in our study survived the three winters of the study, there was some damage during the winter of 2000-01. However, we cannot determine the extent of damage by the time this report will be published.

Vegetative Cultivars

 

Seeded Cultivars

 

Table 1. Color, greenup, leaf texture, and visual quality of vegetatively established bermudagrass cultivars in 2000.


Visual qualityd

Leaf
Cultivar Colora Greenupb texturec May June July Aug Sep Avg

CN2-9 5.7 4.0 7.3 4.0 7.3 7.3 7.7 7.3 6.7
OKC19-9 5.7 4.7 7.3 4.7 7.7 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.7
Tift94e 5.0 4.0 7.3 3.0 7.3 7.3 7.7 7.7 6.6
OKC18-4 6.0 4.0 6.7 4.0 8.0 7.3 7.0 6.3 6.5
Tifgreene 5.0 5.0 7.7 3.3 7.0 7.0 7.7 7.3 6.5
Tifwaye 5.3 4.7 7.7 3.7 6.3 7.0 7.3 7.3 6.3
Midlawne 5.7 7.0 6.7 6.0 5.3 6.7 7.0 6.0 6.2
Mini-Verdee 5.3 3.7 8.7 2.7 7.0 6.0 7.3 6.7 5.9
Cardinal 3.7 6.7 8.3 4.0 5.7 6.7 6.7 6.3 5.9
Shanghaie 7.3 4.3 5.3 3.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.3 5.4
Quickstande 5.0 6.0 6.0 4.3 5.7 4.7 6.0 5.3 5.2
Meyer Zoysiae 4.0 7.3 3.3 3.0 3.7 3.0 4.3 4.0 3.6
.
LSD (0.05) 1.0 1.5 1.2 1.3 1.6 NS 1.2 1.0 0.7

a Color was visually rated on 28 July on a scale of 1 to 9 where 1 = chlorotic, 5 = acceptable, and 9 = dark green.
b Greenup was rated visually rated on 19 Apr on a scale of 1 to 9 where 1 = brown, 5 acceptable, and 9 = fully green.
c Leaf texture was rated visually on 28 July on a scale of 1 to 9 where 1 = coarse bladed and 9 = very fine bladed.
d Quality was visually rated on a scale of 1 to 9 where 1 = dead, 5 = acceptable, and 9 = perfect.
e Commercially available as of May 2000.

 

Table 2. Color, greenup, leaf texture, and visual quality of seeded bermudagrass cultivars in 2000.


Visual qualityd

Leaf
Cultivar Colora Greenupb texturec May June July Aug Sep Avg

OKS-95-1e 5.7 7.0 6.3 4.3 7.0 6.7 6.3 6.7 6.2
Princesse 6.3 3.7 6.7 2.3 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 5.8
SW1-11 5.7 4.3 6.0 2.0 4.7 6.0 7.3 6.7 5.3
Savannahe 6.0 4.7 5.3 3.3 4.0 5.0 6.3 5.7 4.9
PST-R69C 5.3 4.3 5.3 3.3 4.0 4.7 6.0 6.0 4.8
Pyramid 5.3 6.0 5.3 4.0 4.0 4.7 5.0 5.3 4.6
Majestice 5.7 5.0 4.7 3.0 4.3 4.7 5.0 5.7 4.5
Blue-Mudae 5.3 5.7 5.0 3.3 4.0 4.0 4.7 5.3 4.3
J-1224 6.0 5.7 5.0 2.7 3.7 4.3 5.3 5.3 4.3
Panamae 5.7 5.7 5.0 3.7 3.7 4.0 5.3 5.0 4.3
Sundevil IIe 5.3 5.0 4.7 3.0 3.3 4.3 5.0 5.3 4.2
Blackjacke 5.3 5.7 4.3 3.7 4.3 3.7 3.7 5.0 4.1
J-540 5.3 5.3 4.3 4.0 3.3 3.7 4.3 5.3 4.1
SW1-7 6.0 5.3 5.0 2.7 3.0 4.7 4.7 5.3 4.1
Miragee 5.3 5.0 4.3 3.7 5.0 3.7 3.7 4.7 4.1
Numex-Saharae 5.7 6.0 4.7 4.0 4.0 3.3 4.3 4.3 4.0
Jackpote 5.3 5.7 4.0 3.3 3.7 3.3 4.3 4.7 3.9
Shangri-La 5.3 5.3 5.0 2.7 4.0 3.7 4.7 4.7 3.9
AZ Commone 5.0 5.3 4.0 3.3 3.3 3.0 3.7 4.0 3.5
.
LSD (0.05) NS 1.5 0.7 0.9 1.3 1.2 1.3 0.9 0.6

a Color was visually rated on 28 July on a scale of 1 to 9 where 1 = chlorotic, 5 = acceptable, and 9 = dark green.
b Greenup was rated visually rated on 19 Apr on a scale of 1 to 9 where 1 = brown, 5 acceptable, and 9 = fully green.
c Leaf texture was rated visually on 28 July on a scale of 1 to 9 where 1 = coarse bladed and 9 = very fine bladed.
d Quality was visually rated on a scale of 1 to 9 where 1 = dead, 5 = acceptable, and 9 = perfect.
e Commercially available as of May 2000.

 

Table of Contents

 


Send corrections, suggestions, and comments to biehlj@purdue.edu