Last updated 7/3/01

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT PERMISSION

Table of Contents

Low Input Sustainable Turf - 2000 Results

Clark Throssell and Dan Weisenberger

Objective

Our objective was to determine the effect on turf quality by mixing legume species with tall fescue and sheep fescue.

Rationale

Low input sustainable turf is an area that will receive minimal attention but not be totally neglected. Even though it is low input or low maintenance it is still desirable for the area to be somewhat uniform, have few weeds, and be persistent over time. From previous studies it has been determined that tall fescue and sheep fescue are the best choices for grass species under these conditions, and a mowing height of 3.5 inches with a frequency of every other week is most desirable. This study was designed to go one step farther and see if mixtures of species could improve results without adding inputs.

How It Was Done

A seedbed was prepared at the William H. Daniel Turfgrass and Diagnostic Center. A starter fertilizer was applied to the area at the rate 0.2 lbs N, 1.0 lbs P2O5, and 0.2 lbs K2O/1000 ft2. The plots were seeded 29 Aug-97 and watered that fall to insure uniform establishment. No irrigation was applied after establishment. The plots were mowed every other week at 3.5 inches with clippings returned. One lb N/1000 ft2, using sulfur-coated urea, was applied toward the end of Sep each year. No pesticides were applied during this study. Data collected was percent of the plot covered by desired species fall 1997, spring and fall 1998. Visual quality of plot was recorded spring, summer, and fall each year. Visual quality was rated on a scale of 1 - 9 with 1 = no living turf, 5 = acceptable turf, and 9 = ideal turf. Percent of the plot covered by broadleaf weeds spring, summer, and fall each year. Percent of plot covered by desired legume summer and fall 1999 and 2000.

Results

 

Table 1. Visual quality ratings of Low Input Sustainable Turf for 1998, 1999, and 2000.


Apr July Oct Apr June Oct May July Oct
Treatment 98 98 98 99 99 99 00 00 00

SFa 2.0b 5.0 4.7 6.7 6.0 5.7 6.7 6.0 7.0
TF 3.0 5.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 7.0 6.7 6.3 6.3
SF+ TF 3.0 5.7 7.0 7.0 6.7 6.3 7.0 5.7 6.3
SF+ TF+ KB 3.3 6.0 7.0 6.7 7.0 6.7 6.3 6.3 6.0
SF+ SC 3.0 5.7 4.7 6.7 6.7 6.0 6.7 6.0 6.7
SF+ RC 3.0 6.0 6.3 6.3 6.0 6.0 7.0 5.7 7.3
SF+ BT 2.7 6.0 7.0 6.3 6.7 7.3 7.0 7.0 7.7
TF+ SC 3.7 6.0 6.7 6.7 6.3 6.3 6.0 7.0 6.0
TF+ RC 4.0 6.0 6.7 7.0 6.7 6.0 6.7 6.3 6.0
TF+ BT 3.3 6.0 6.7 7.0 6.7 6.7 6.3 6.3 6.0
SF+ TF+ SC 3.3 6.0 7.0 6.7 6.7 6.3 6.3 6.0 6.0
SF+ TF+ RC 3.7 5.3 6.3 7.0 6.0 6.3 6.7 5.7 6.3
SF+ TF+ BT 3.3 5.7 6.7 7.0 7.0 6.7 7.0 6.0 6.0
TF+ CRF + BT + PR 4.3 5.7 6.3 7.0 6.7 6.3 7.0 6.0 6.7
.
LSD (0.05) 0.7 NS 0.8 NS NS 0.7 NS 0.7 1.0

a SF = sheep fescue, TF = tall fescue, KB = Kentucky blue grass, SC = white flowering sweet clover, RC = red clover, BT = birdsfoot trefoil, CRF = creeping red fescue, and PR = perennial ryegrass.
b Visual quality ratings were taken using a scale of 1 - 9 with 1 = no living turf, 5 = acceptable turf, and 9 = ideal turf.

 

Table 2. Percent of Low Input Sustainable Turf plot area covered by the desired legume.


Jun Oct May July Oct
Treatment 99 99 00 00 00

----------------------%----------------------

SFa 0.0b 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
TF 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SF+ TF 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SF+ TF+ KB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SF+ SC 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.7
SF+ RC 18.3 16.7 6.7 2.0 3.0
SF+ BT 40.0 26.7 26.7 31.7 38.3
TF+ SC 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0
TF+ RC 30.0 5.7 5.7 1.7 1.3
TF+ BT 31.7 7.0 23.3 16.7 11.7
SF+ TF+ SC 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0
SF+ TF+ RC 21.7 7.3 5.7 1.3 2.7
SF+ TF+ BT 33.3 13.3 23.3 21.7 20.0
TF+ CRF + BT + PR 36.7 11.7 20.0 20.0 18.3
.
LSD (0.05) 7.5 3.8 4.4 4.5 5.5

a SF = sheep fescue, TF = tall fescue, KB = Kentucky blue grass, SC = white flowering sweet clover, RC = red clover, BT = birdsfoot trefoil, CRF = creeping red fescue, and PR = perennial ryegrass.
b Percent of plot area covered by desired legume.

 

Table 3. Percent of Low Input Sustainable Turf plot area covered by broadleaf weeds.


Apr Oct Apr Jun Oct May July Oct
Treatment 98 98 99 99 99 00 00 00

--------------------------------------% ---------------------------------------

SFa 55.0b 9.7 6.0 6.3 4.7 3.3 2.7 4.0
TF 36.7 1.3 2.7 3.7 2.0 3.7 2.3 2.3
SF+ TF 30.0 2.0 1.3 3.3 1.3 2.3 2.3 2.7
SF+ TF+ KB 28.3 1.7 1.0 1.3 0.0 1.3 1.3 2.7
SF+ SC 43.3 6.3 5.7 3.3 2.0 3.3 2.3 3.7
SF+ RC 30.0 2.3 3.0 3.7 3.0 3.0 2.7 3.7
SF+ BT 35.0 2.3 1.7 1.3 1.0 1.7 1.3 1.3
TF+ SC 20.0 2.3 2.7 8.0 2.7 3.0 2.3 2.3
TF+ RC 21.7 0.3 2.0 1.7 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.3
TF+ BT 26.7 1.7 2.0 1.3 0.3 1.7 0.7 1.0
SF+ TF+ SC 26.7 1.7 1.7 3.0 2.0 2.3 2.3 2.3
SF+ TF+ RC 21.7 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.0 1.7 2.3
SF+ TF+ BT 21.7 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.7
TF+ CRF + BT + PR 15.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.7 0.7 1.7 1.3
.
LSD (0.05) 17.2 3.1 2.9 NS 1.4 1.4 NS NS

a SF = sheep fescue, TF = tall fescue, KB = Kentucky blue grass, SC = white flowering sweet clover, RC = red clover, BT = birdsfoot trefoil, CRF = creeping red fescue, and PR = perennial ryegrass.
b Percent of plot area covered by broadleaf weeds.

 

Table of Contents

 


Send corrections, suggestions, and comments to biehlj@purdue.edu