Sorghum has received serious consideration as a grain crop in some Indiana locations. With adapted hybrids and proper management, sorghum will usually produce higher returns than either corn or soybeans on certain soil types and low rainfall areas, especially if the grain is fed to livestock (see Purdue Extension Publication AY-198). This publication provides producers, seedsmen, extension educators and others with information on sorghum hybrid performance.
A total of 27 hybrids from the 7 companies listed in Table 5 were evaluated at four locations in Indiana. One of the earliest sorghum hybrids to be developed, RS610, and a Purdue cultivar of good agronomic quality and wide adaptation, P954063, were used in each year's trials as standards against which newer commercial hybrids can be compared.
The four trials in 1996 are shown in Figure 1.
Location 1 (Tippecanoe County). The trial was at the Purdue University Agronomy Research Center (ARC) near West Lafayette, on a Chambers silty clay loam soil.
Location 2 (Jennings County). The trial was at the Southeast Purdue Agricultural Center (SEPAC) near North Vernon, on a Avonburg silt loam soil.
Location 3 (Knox County). The trial was at the Southwest Purdue Agricultural Center (SWPAC) near Vincennes, on a Ross loam soil.
Location 4 (Dubois County). The trial was at the Southern Indiana Purdue Agricultural Center (SIPAC) near Dubois, on Tilsit silt loam soil.
Plots. The plots were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications at each location. Each plot consisted of two rows 16 feet long with 30 inch row spacing.
Planting. The seedbeds were prepared by conventional tillage. Location 1 was planted with a John Deere Max-emerge planter. Locations 2, 3 and 4 were planted with a two row cone planter. The seeding rate was approximately 10 seeds per foot. Plant population was thinned to six plants per foot shortly after emergence resulting in approximately 100,000 plants per acre
Cultural Practices. Ramrod-atrazine pre-plant or pre-emerge herbicide combination was used for weed control in all locations. Each location was cultivated at least once and hand weeded as necessary. An optimum soil fertility level was maintained in order to allow maximum hybrid performance.
Harvest. At the three southern-most locations, heads from all plants in a 10-foot section of each row of the two-row plot were hand harvested. The Tippecanoe County trial was harvested with a plot combine. After threshing, grain moisture was recorded and yields adjusted to 13.5 percent moisture.
Information recorded. Half-bloom, plant height and percent bird damage were recorded during the growing season. Half-bloom is the number of days from planting until 50 percent of the plants have shed pollen halfway down the head. Physiological maturity (cessation of dry matter accumulation in the grain) is reached 35-40 days after half-bloom. Plant height is the average height, in inches, from the soil surface to the tip of the head at maturity. Bird damage was measured by visual estimation of the percentage of grain yield lost to bird feeding.
Results of the 1996 performance tests are presented by location in Tables 1 through 4. General conditions present at each location are given below.
Location 1 (Tippecanoe County). The hybrids were planted on June 6. Rainfall from April through October totaled 22.94 inches. No lodging or bird damage was observed. A very wet spring contributed to the late planting date. The growing season was fair, but cool nights added to the lower than average yields. Growing degree day (GDD) accumulation totaled 3411. Yields averaged 127 bu/acre, with the yield of the highest hybrid averaging 159 bu/acre.
Location 2 (Jennings County). The hybrids were planted on May 25. Rainfall from April through October totaled 32.12 inches. No lodging or bird damage was observed. Above average moisture in early May contributed to a later planting date. The growing season then turned to above average, with the later warm days,and more timely rainfall. Growing degree day (GDD) accumulation totaled 4440. Yields averaged 97 bu/acre, with the yield of the highest hybrid averaging 141 bu/acre.
Location 3 (Knox County). The hybrids were planted on June 15. Rainfall from April through October totaled 27.26 inches. The trial was also damaged by birds, with the average amount of bird feeding surpassing 20 percent of the potential yield on some hybrids, resulting in the harvest of only two replications. No CV.% or LSD (5%) was given for yield in this trial. Growing degree day (GDD) accumulation totaled 3787. Yields averaged 72 bu/acre, with the yield of the highest hybrid averaging 90 bu/acre.
Location 4 (Dubois County). The hybrids were planted on June 25. Rainfall from April through October totaled 48.82 inches. A small amount of bird damage was observed for some of the hybrids. A early wet season contributed to the very late planting date. Some hybrids were then damaged by the first frost. Growing degree day (GDD) accumulation totaled 3641. Yields averaged 78 bu/acre,with the highest hybrid averaging 101 bu/acre.
An analysis of variance was conducted and the Least Significant Difference (LSD) computed at the 5 percent level of significance. The LSD indicates how much one entry must differ from another entry within a location to be reasonably certain that it is a true difference. If the yield difference between the two hybrids is less than the LSD, then other factors must be considered in deciding which hybrids to grow, such as days to flowering. The LSD is given in the same units as the average (i.e. pounds per acre, etc.). An asterisk (*) beside a yield average on a performance table indicates that the yield is not significantly different from the highest yield in the table.
The coefficient of variation (CV) was determined for the traits measured. The CV measures the amount of experimental error relative to the average and indicates how much error was present. When yields are high relative to the experimental error, the CV will be small.
Growing degree day (GDD). A modified 50 scale was used. GDD equals daily mean minus 50 (below 50 adjust to 50, above 86 adjust to 86).
Participating companies. The companies participating in the 1996 performance trials are listed in Table 5.
The Purdue University Sorghum Project acknowledges the assistance of the following individuals and their staff for help with the field preparation for the 1996 Commercial Grain Sorghum Performance Trial.
Jim Beaty, Superintendent - Agronomy Research Center (ARC)
Don Biehle, Superintendent - SEPAC
Melborn Lang, Superintendent - SWPAC
Frank Potts, Superintendent - SIPAC
Credit is given to Philip Hess for writing the computer software, Vartest, used in preparing the performance tables. Sincere gratitude is also expressed to Bill Foster, Karen Clymer, Corie Shaner Troy Hatke, Jon Leuck, and Danny Greene for their overall support of the 1996 Sorghum Yield Testing program.
Copyright information
This information, protected by copyright by the Purdue Research Foundation, is presented under authority granted the Indiana Agriculture Research Programs to conduct performance trials, including interpretation of data to the public, and does not imply endorsement or recommendation by Purdue University. Permission is granted to reproduce tables only in their entirety provided the source is referenced and the data are not rearranged, manipulated or reinterpreted. A conspicuous disclaimer which states "endorsement or recommendation by Purdue University is not implied" must accompany any information reproduced. Additional copies of this publication are available to Indiana residents through their local Purdue Cooperative Extension Office or Media Distribution.
Return to top
Go to Agronomy Extension site
Return to Performance of Sorghum in Indiana
Please send comments or complaints to: cjanssen@dept.agry.purdue.edu .