If you would like to receive Corny News Network articles and other corny information 
  by email, contact RL (Bob) Nielsen.  
Other Corny News Network articles can be viewed at the CNN 
  Archives. 
	 Published 9 July
		2003
 
	  
       
	 
 
	  Rain, Hail, Wind: What Next?
		 
 
	 
       
	 
 
      
	 
requent and heavy rainfall in recent days has caused
		record and near-record flooding of rivers, creeks, and streams throughout much
		of Indiana. Large ponded areas exist in fields distant from floodwaters. The
		rains have often been accompanied by damaging winds and hail that have caused
		additional damage to the states corn, soybean, and wheat crops. The
		consequences to grain yield and quality from the damage caused by the
		flooding/ponding and wind are difficult to pinpoint with much accuracy because
		little research exists that addresses these chance-occurring yield-limiting
		factors. Risks and expectations, however, can be outlined. 
 
	 Click on image to view larger
		popup version.





 
	  
		- Rules of thumb suggest that corn and soybean crops inundated by standing water may only
		  survive a few days with the 90-degree temperatures that have been prevalent
		  during this epic rainfall episode. Oxygen deprivation quickly results in
		  significant deterioration and death of above- and below-ground plant tissue.
		  
  
	 
 
	  
		- Further physical crop
		  damage (soil erosion, washing away of plants, lodging of
		  plants, and plant tissue damage) occurs from the force of the flowing water on
		  land adjacent to flooded creeks and rivers as well as from any debris caught up
		  in the floodwaters. 
  
	 
 
	  
		- Severe lodging of wheat
		  yet unharvested will result in yield loss due to mechanical harvesting
		  difficulties and/or reduction in grain quality due to weathering and sprouting
		  of grain (Lipps et al. 2003). The quality of wheat straw harvested from these
		  ponded areas will also be lower. 
  
	 
 
	  
		- Deposits of sediment and crop
		  residues often remain on crop plants once the water recedes
		  that either outright smother any surviving plants or greatly reduce their
		  ability to capture sunlight and photosynthesize carbohydrates. 
  
	 
 
	  
		- Mud and crud that cakes the leaves and stalks encourage subsequent
		  development of fungal and bacterial
		  diseases in damaged plant tissue. When Deer Creek (Carroll
		  County) flooded severely in August of 1998, adjacent fields of corn that were
		  in the initial stages of pollination subsequently developed severe bacterial
		  ear rots following inundation by flood waters at or above the ear level of the
		  plants (Nielsen & Ruhl, 1998). 
  
	 
 
	  
		- Crops that survive less severe bouts of ponding and saturated soils
		  will nonetheless suffer significant damage to
		  their root systems. The immediate effects will be stunting of
		  plant development. In the longer term, root systems compromised by ponding and
		  saturated soils now will be less able to sustain the crops IF drought
		  conditions would develop later in the growing season. 
  
	 
 
	  
		- For corn, damage to its root system now will predispose the crop to
		  the development of root and stalk
		  rots later by virtue of the photosynthetic stress imposed by
		  the limited root system during the important grain filling period following
		  pollination. Monitor affected fields later in August for the possible
		  development of stalk rots and modify harvest-timing strategies accordingly.
		  
  
	 
 
	  
		- Loss of soil nitrate nitrogen in saturated soils due to denitrification or leaching processes is
		  undoubtedly occurring at significant rates. Estimates of nitrate-N loss due to
		  waterlogged soil conditions are at least five percent per day given the current
		  warm soil temperatures (Hoeft, 2002). Many cornfields in the affected area are
		  still in their rapid growth phase prior to pollination when nitrogen uptake
		  rates are at their peak. Consequently, some of these fields currently enduring
		  soggy soil conditions may ultimately develop nitrogen deficiency symptoms
		  without additional fertilizer applications. Where estimated nitrogen loss is
		  significant (60 lbs or greater) in fields not yet tasseling and yield potential
		  is still reasonable, corn may respond to an additional 50  80 lbs of
		  applied fertilizer N up to or shortly after tasseling (Hoeft, 2001). 
  
	 
 
	  
		- Assessing the effects of hail
		  damage to corn can be challenging. Important factors include the
		  amount of defoliation and stalk bruising caused by the hail stones relative to
		  the growth stage of the crop. While hail damage can result in severe yield
		  losses in corn, most of the time the human eye perceives greater damage than
		  truly exists. Browse the two references listed below (Nielsen, 2001; Vorst,
		  1993) on hail damage assessment for more information. 
  
	 
 
	  
		- Wind damage to corn has occurred
		  either as stalk breakage (aka green snap) or root lodging (plants
		  uprooted and laying nearly flat to the ground). The yield effect of green
		  snap damage depends on the percentage of field affected and whether the
		  stalk breakage occurs above or below the ear, but is usually serious
		  regardless. Obviously, stalk breakage below the ear results in zero yield for
		  that plant. Stalk breakage above the ear results in significant yield loss due
		  to the loss of upper canopy photosynthesis capacity for that plant. Root lodged
		  corn will recover or straighten up to varying degrees depending on the growth
		  stage of the crop. Generally, younger corn has a greater ability to straighten
		  up with minimal goose-necking than older corn. Yield effects of
		  root lodging depend on whether soil moisture remains adequate for root
		  regeneration, the severity of root damage due to the uprooting nature of root
		  lodging, and the degree of goose-necking that develops and its
		  effect on the harvestability of the crop. 
  
	 
 
	 Related References 
 
	 Hoeft, Robert. 2001. Nitrogen Loss Update. Univ. of Illinois Pest
		& Crop Bulletin (6/22/01). Online at
		http://www.ag.uiuc.edu/cespubs/pest/articles/200113g.html
		[URL verified 7/9/03]. 
 
	 Hoeft, Robert. 2002. Predicting/Measuring Nitrogen Loss. Univ. of
		Illinois Pest & Crop Bulletin (5/17/02). Online at
		http://www.ag.uiuc.edu/cespubs/pest/articles/200208n.html
		[URL verified 7/9/03]. 
 
	 Lipps, Pat, Jim Beuerlein, and Dennis Mills. 2003. Potential
		Wheat Harvest Problems Caused by Persistent Rain. Ohio State Univ.
		C.O.R.N. (7/7-13/03). Online at
		http://corn.osu.edu/archive/2003/jul/03-21.html
		[URL verified 7/9/03].
 
	 Nielsen, Bob. 2001. Hail Damage in Corn: Moving Beyond Grief to
		Damage Assessment. Purdue Univ. Online at
		http://www.kingcorn.org/news/articles.01/Hail_Damage-0606.html
		[URL verified 7/9/03]. 
 
	 Nielsen, Bob and Gail Ruhl. 1998. Bacterial Ear Rot in Flooded
		Corn. Purdue Univ. Online at
		http://www.kingcorn.org/news/articles.98/p&c9828.html
		[URL verified 7/9/03]. 
 
	 Thomison, Peter. 2001. Weather Conditions Favorable for "Green
		Snap". Ohio State Univ. C.O.R.N. (6/18024/01). Online at
		http://corn.osu.edu/archive/2001/jun/01-18.html#linkc
		[URL verified 7/9/03]. 
 
	 Vorst, Jim. 1993. Assessing Hail Damage to Corn. Purdue Univ.
		Extension Publication NCH-1. Online at
		http://www.agcom.purdue.edu/AgCom/Pubs/NCH/NCH-1.html
		[URL verified 7/9/03]. 
 
	 
      
	  
 
For 
        other information about corn, take a look at the Corn Growers' Guidebook 
        at http://www.kingcorn.org.
 
©2003, Purdue University, 
        all rights reserved. It is the policy of the Purdue 
        Agronomy Department that all persons shall have equal opportunity 
        and access to its programs and facilities without regard to race, color, 
        sex, religion, national origin, age, or disability. Purdue University is an Affirmative Action 
        employer. This material may be available in alternative formats.
 
	  End of document