Hybrid Selection: Where’s the Beef?
R.L. (Bob) Nielsen
Agronomy Dept., Purdue Univ.
West Lafayette, IN 47907-2054
Email address:
 can
remember the excitement as a kid when the first Christmas mail-order catalogs
would arrive in the mail from Sears, JC Penney, or Montgomery Ward. I
think some of that excitement lingers today when the seed corn company
sales literature arrives in the mail or when I attend a seed company field
day in late August or early September and listen to the enthusiastic sales
pitches. All the hopes of a record, bin-busting crop for next year are
represented in those glossy multi-color pages that extol the virtues of
the latest and greatest hybrids with every imaginable biotech trait that
promise to beat last year’s hybrid performance by 20 or more bushels per
acre.
The reality of hybrid selection today is that pressure to place seed
orders comes earlier and earlier than ever before. In the “old days”,
a guy would wait until January or February to place a seed order. By then,
you would have had the time to peruse yield reports from your local land-grant
university variety trials or those from the seed companies to identify
the hybrids you wanted to purchase. Today, more and more sales pressure
occurs before the current year’s variety trials have even been harvested.
What’s a guy to do?
Documented consistency
in yield performance is still the key to success in selecting hybrids
that will perform well in your farming operation. Sales pitches at field
days or in farm magazine advertisements should serve only to heighten
your awareness of seed companies, their hybrid traits, or specific hybrids
and should NOT take the place of meaningful yield data from well-designed
hybrid performance trials.
When you are pressured to choose this hybrid or that one because the
sales rep assures you it will perform well, don’t hesitate to ask for
the performance data that backs up the recommendation. Be like the little
old lady in the 1984 Wendy’s™ hamburger TV commercial who demands to know
“Where’s the beef?”.
Even though you are making hybrid selection decisions in August or September,
take the time to peruse the results of variety trials from the previous
year. Except for the newest of hybrids, performance data from the previous
year are useful for identifying consistent
performers for your operation next year.
How do you identify consistent performers that will likely
perform well for you? The secret lies in looking for trials that evaluate
hybrids over multiple locations. Multiple testing locations in a single
year represent possible weather patterns your farm may encounter in the
future. Weather variability influences hybrid performance more than any
other variable, because weather interacts with most of the other yield
limiting factors. If a hybrid performs consistently
well over many sites (i.e., weather patterns), then it will likely perform
well on your farm in the future.
(Please, re-read the last paragraph. Its message is the most
important one in this article!)
Most university hybrid performance programs evaluate hybrids over multiple
locations plus multiple years within select maturity zones. Several third-party
testing groups also evaluate hybrids over multiple sites. Seed companies
obviously evaluate hybrids over hundreds if not thousands of sites each
year. Seek out summaries over many locations and avoid concentrating on
single site results.
For multiple site trials where the data have been statistically analyzed,
consistent performers are
mostly likely found within the upper group of similar-yielding hybrids
as determined by a trial’s L.S.D. value. For multiple site trials for
which statistical analysis of the data has not been performed, you can
identify consistent performers by evaluating hybrid
performance relative to the average yield of the trial or relative to
the maximum yielding hybrid in a trial.
For example, look for those hybrids that consistently yield 5% above the average
yield of trials in which they are entered. If the trial average yield
is 180 bpa, look for hybrids yielding 189 bpa or greater (180 x 1.05).
Another way to look for consistent
performers is to identify hybrids that consistently
yield at least 90% of the maximum yielding hybrid in a trial. If the highest
yield in a trial is 225 bpa, look for hybrids that yield 203 bpa or greater
(225 x 0.90).
Remember, the key factor in choosing hybrids for your farming operation
next year is documented performance against a range of competitors, not
simply specific head-to-head comparisons. Once you have identified a group
of otherwise consistent
high-yielding hybrids, further filter them for traits important to your
situation. For example, corn following corn demands hybrids with superior
resistance to important foliar diseases such as gray leaf spot or northern
corn leaf blight.
Related References
Purdue Crop Performance Program. 2007. Purdue Univ. Agronomy
Dept. [On-Line]. Available at http://www.agry.purdue.edu/pcpp/index.html
(URL accessed 8/27/07).
Univ. of Illinois Variety Testing Program. 2007. Univ.
of Illinois Crop Sciences Dept. [On-Line]. Available at http://vt.cropsci.uiuc.edu
(URL accessed 8/27/07).
Kentucky Grain Crops Variety Trials. 2007. Univ. of Kentucky
Plant & Soil Sciences Dept. [On-Line]. Available at http://www.uky.edu/Ag/GrainCrops/varietytesting.htm
(URL accessed 8/27/07).
Michigan State Variety Trials. 2007. Michigan State Univ.
Crop & Soil Sciences Dept. [On-Line]. Available at http://www.css.msu.edu/varietytrials
(URL accessed 8/27/07).
Ohio Crop Performance Trials. 2007. Ohio State Univ. Horticulture
& Crop Sciences Dept. [On-Line]. Available at http://ohioline.osu.edu/~perf/index.html
(URL accessed 8/27/07).
Soy Capital Ag Services. 2007. (Select “seed testing”
from sidebar menu). [On-Line]. Available at http://www.soycapitalag.com
(URL accessed 8/27/07).
Icorn.com. 2007. Third Party Yield Data. [On-Line]. Available
at http://www.icorn.com/yielddata.aspx
(URL accessed 8/27/07).
F.I.R.S.T. 2007. Farmers Independent Research of Seed
Technologies. [On-Line]. Available at http://www.firstseedtests.com
(URL accessed 8/27/07).
|